Reviewing music
Before we get to Mahler, let me start more general. You’ll see that I often recommend albums that have also been recommended by major classical magazines such as Gramophone and Classica. Sometimes it gets a bit extreme, when Gramophone recently came up with a list of the Top 10 Schubert recordings, in my handful of reviews so far I’ve already mentioned 2 out of the top 10 (Schiff and the Pavel Haas Quartet)
That is obviously no coincidence. I read several magazines to keep me posted on new releases and to get a hint on which ones are worth a closer look. So you could kind of ask, why bother reading my blog and not go directly to the original source. Well, obviously I strongly encourage you to read the original source. Our ailing classical press is probably even worse off than the rest of the music industry and needs every paying subscriber they can get.
That said, I simply don’t always agree with the critics, and you’ll always find my own personal opinion here. I’ve described here how I come up with my ratings, which are obviously absolutely subjective.
The thing is, I’m not the only one being subjective, everybody else, including the professional reviewers, are. There simply aren’t any objective standards to say why one recording is good, another one is bad, beyond simple technical faults (and even here, many prefer an Artur Schnabel playing Beethoven in spite of his many objective playing mistakes).
Ivan Fischer’s Mahler 9
This recording is a case in point. Gramophone names it among the Editor’s Choices of the month, and calls it “a potential Gramophone award winner”, Classica in this month’s issue calls the very same album “disappointing”, and gives it one star, the worst ranking out of 5. They even just bring it up in the “Egalement réçus” (also received) page, which I usually don’t even bother reading (it’s very text heavy and not easy to read). Doesn’t get more extreme than this. (Footnote: Overall, I like this approach, these day too often every single review is positive, and positive review ONLY make sense if there’s also stuff you don’t like at all).
So who is right? The problem is, I don’t know. I’m not a big Mahler fan overall. I like the 1st and 4th, and the 5th up to a point, and struggle with the rest. The 9th I’ve only started partially appreciating recently, 1-2 years ago (with Abbado), and so I simply don’t know the work well enough to make a proper judgment. I really liked Fischer’s approach to Mahler 1 and 4, which I feel comfortable judging, but on the ninth all I can say I haven’t found any obvious flaws yet.
What I can say is that the recording, like pretty much every single album by the Dutch Channel Classics label, is extremely well recorded, and is a pleasure listening to just for that. With a good hifi system you’ll be in for a treat. I recommend download a high resolution version directly from their website or buy an SACD if you have a compatible player.
If you’re a Mahler aficionado, and you’re reading this, I’d very much appreciate your opinion in the comments section on this rather controversial approach to Gustav Mahler.
I haven’t had the chance to listen to this recording yet, but Mahler recordings can tend to get divided opinions. Like you, I often look up critics’ reviews of albums before purchasing, but I also listen to previews and samples before buying too. It all depends on your own ears in the end; no critics can ultimately “tell you” what you like.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Couldn’t agree more. Would certainly be interested in what you think about the Fischer recording.
LikeLike
I had missed this post. I bought the Fischer/BFO recording as soon as it was released, but I too have to admit I was disappointed. The sonics seemed too rounded, too fuzzy. Interpretatively, I never felt the stakes were high enough, especially in the first movement. Where are the triumphant chords that are held too long, so they turn into screams of despair? Where is the feeling of a man desperately clinging to life? Take the first sort-of climax around 2:40: where is the searing high note that sends shivers down the spine? As I posted in your recent Mahler 1 review, the Karajan/Berliner live recording of the ninth symphony was the one where, for me, everything snapped into focus.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree. And must admit when I listen to the 9th (still quite rarely) I listen mostly to Abbado/BPO
LikeLike