Andreas Staier
Let me start by pointing out that I’m a big fan of Andreas Staier. I’ve praised his Diabelli Variations here, I like his approach to Mozart and Schumann, as well as his album “Pour Passer la Mélancholie”. His 2012 album of the 6 piano concertos by Carl Philipp Emmanuel Bach is outstanding.
Freiburger Barockorchester
The same goes for the Freiburger Barockorchester (who joins Staier on excellent the CPE Bach album above). Their recording of the Bach Orchestral Suites is my go-to version, and the recently started Schumann cycle with Isabelle Faust, Alexander Melnikov and Jean-Guihen Queyras (more about the Melnikov in the next days) is very very good.
The Bach “Piano” concertos
Bach wrote quite a number of concertos for harpsichord. As was not unusual at the time, several of them were probably recycled from other sources, e.g. other solo concertos or cantatas. You’ll find concertos for 1-4(!) soloists.
So far, I still haven’t found “my” version. My currently preferred versions are the 2011 Linn recording of the Retrospect Ensemble with Matthew Halls conducting and playing, Pierre Hantai’s slightly idiosyncratic but very interesting version with Le Concert Français (see my review of his Goldberg variations here), and most of all Café Zimmermann’s energetic readings, which are unfortunately spread over 6 albums (all worth getting anyhow!) and only have the concertos with several instruments.
Therefore, when I heard about this recording by Staier with the Freiburger, I was very excited and already had it on pre-order. Luckily, I was distracted, didn’t get to click on buy, and therefore ended up listening to it on Qobuz streaming first.
I’m happy I did, because at this stage I don’t think I will end up buying this album.Maybe it was just that I was expecting too much, but my “inner ear” has a very different idea on how these concertos should sound.
It pains me to write critical words about musicians that I admire very much, but the album generally sounds a bit heavy and slow, and does not at all the lightweight “swing” I so much love about most recent Historically Informed Performances.
In a way this reminds me of Karl Richter’s way of playing Bach. There is obviously nothing wrong with approaching the music this way, it is just really not my cup of tea.
Obviously this approach, and the sometimes slower tempi also allow for more nuances and there are very beautiful moments in this album, e.g. in the Largo of BWV1056.
But most of the time, this is not for me.
Overall rating: 3 stars. I really didn’t expect ever to give such a relatively low rating to these outstanding musicians. is it just me? I’d really love to hear your feedback especially if you disagree!
EDIT August 28, 2015: I seem to be the odd one out here with my opinion. Classica “Choc”, 5 stars from Diapason, 5 stars from the Guardian. So be warned, I may just be a crazy lunatic in not particularly liking this album. I’d appreciate even more your feedback on this, as after 4 more listenings, I stand by my opinion. Please tell me if I need a new pair of ears!
EDIT Oct 11, 2015: Just reading the review in the October issue of Gramophone, and at least Jonathan Freeman-Atwood seems to have heard what I’ve heard. To quote: “If you’re looking for fun, abandon, lyricism, radiant lift off […] and luminosity, then maybe this one is not for you”. He’s spot on, that’s exactly what’s lacking for me.
For me the sound is excellent. and beautiful interpretation. thanks
LikeLiked by 1 person
Fully agree on the sound, but I’m still not sold on the interpretation. Look like I’m the odd one out on this one.
LikeLike
The interpretations seem ‘OK’ to me, but no revelations.
But the sound is terrible: much, much too loud, with a lot of distortion (by compression).
A victim of the loudness war.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Interesting. OK kind of captures it well, in the end that’s what they are, I probably just expected more.
Given that I didn’t like the interpretation, I never bought this so haven’t checked any technical details, eg dynamic range. Will have another look
LikeLike
Hello. Interesting review. Just like you, I also had a strong interest in this recording when it was first announced. However, when pre-listening the recording on itunes, I didn’t fell for it and moved on. Today, I was browsing Itunes and Qobuz for new recordings and tried this recording once again; I looked up several of the reviews you’ve mentioned and visited your blog for the first time. While listening to the first concerto and reading this review simultaneously, I immediately realised why I didn’t like it as much as expected. Tempi are indeed too slow (for me).
Thank you for the recommendation of the sei concerti of CPE Bach. I neglected this recording in the past but I’ve just pre-listened it and I think I will up buying this older recording!
Interesting blog I must say. Bookmarked it, so I will be back! 🙂 Keep on writing those reviews!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Arthur, thanks for the kind words and for confirming that I’m not the only individual on this planet who doesn’t like the Staier recording!
LikeLike
Thanks for your review. Not being an expert (my playing is very limitted) there was something odd when listening to these versions. So I decided to look for opinions. I totally agree that in general it sounds heavy. I also love the ethereal agility of Café Zimmermann.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes I’m still on the lookout for my “perfect” version. Cafe Zimmermann remains among my favorites, and I also started liking more and more Pierre Hantaï’s recording with Jordi Savall of BWV1052 on this album: https://musicophilesblog.com/tag/pierre-hantai/. Do you have a current favorite?
LikeLike